OUR METHOD
How we compare autoblogging tools
Which tools we include
A tool qualifies if it automates part of running a blog: picking topics, writing, scheduling or publishing. Some only draft. Others publish without you, and we mark which is which. Being listed is not an endorsement.
How we check facts
- We read the tool's own live website, pricing page or docs. We never use another review or comparison site as a source.
- For each field we save the source URL, the date we checked and a short evidence note, all in data/tools.json.
- We list the monthly-billed price. When a page shows a yearly rate, a promotion or an unclear billing period, we say so.
- We record where a tool publishes and whether it publishes on a schedule as two separate facts, because one does not prove the other.
- If we can't verify a fact, we write “Not stated”. If a vendor's own pages disagree, we show both numbers.
How we suggest a fit
Each “Best for” line names the job a tool's published features suit. It's our judgement, not a score. Tools are listed A to Z. PostSprout follows the same sourcing rules as every other tool, and we don't call it best overall.
What we can't tell you
Which tool writes the best articles, how fast each one runs, or whether its posts rank. We didn't buy every plan or grade sample articles, so a feature in the table is the vendor's claim, not our test result. Languages, images and integrations can vary by plan; confirm the one you need before you pay.
Dates and changes
Each “Checked on” date is the day we read that source. An offer can change the next day. “Last updated” is the date of the whole snapshot, and we change it by hand when we recheck.
Last updated .